![]() ![]() A perfect example of this came from the way he ended his review of To the Wonder. It was by getting to these layers of a film that Ebert was able to provide reviews that usually went beyond the mundane, and provided the reader with genuinely utilitarian insights into it. One of Ebert's greatest gifts as a critic was often how he seemed able to cut through all the superficiality of a movie and pluck out its very heart and soul. Related: 10 Greatest Movies of All Time According to Roger Ebert This, coupled with his almost mystical knowledge of the mechanics, artistry, and gradations of filmmaking, and the entertainment industry in general, gave him the ability to appreciate subtleties and minute details about films that most people could never hope to recognize. Like the artistic and almost whimsical deftness that To the Wonder tries to convey, Roger Ebert could also be said to have had the soul of a great artist. The second was that, in having an opinion that ran counter to the consensus (and acknowledging it), Ebert humbly displayed the fact that he often saw things in a way that ordinary people simply could not. He didn't have any overarching pretension or grandiosity for his knowledge of the medium like many reviewers often unwittingly do. The first was that Ebert was humble enough to never force his opinion down readers' throats - usually preferring his love of cinema, film, and the art form itself to inform his views. Through it, he seemed to have woven two significant facts into his prose. Despite being widely regarded as the greatest critic around in his time, and despite Ebert's brilliant views being ones you could usually bank on, there was often a unique tone of humility that ran through the undercurrent of his reviews. In its own way, this thread of honesty and realism in knowing that his own opinion wasn't always lore was what often distinguished him as a critic. Roger Ebert himself was cognizant of this and didn't stray from the fact that many opinions of the film would likely counter his. He also hosted the annual Roger Ebert's Overlooked Film Festival in Champaign, Illinois from 1999 until his death.Related: Top 20 Movies of the 2000s, According to Roger Ebert He has honorary degrees from the University of Colorado, the American Film Institute, and the School of the Art Institute of Chicago.įrom 1994 until his death in 2013, he wrote a Great Movies series of individual reviews of what he deemed to be the most important films of all time. Roger Ebert was named as the most influential pundit in America by Forbes Magazine, beating the likes of Bill Maher, Lou Dobbs, and Bill O'Reilly. Ebert was awarded a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in June 2005, the first professional film critic to receive one. In February 1995, a section of Chicago's Erie Street near the CBS Studios was given the honorary name Siskel & Ebert Way. His television programs have also been widely syndicated, and have been nominated for Emmy awards. In 1975, Ebert became the first film critic to win a Pulitzer Prize for Criticism. He wrote more than 15 books, including his annual movie yearbook. The program was retitled Ebert & Roeper and the Movies in 2000.Įbert's movie reviews were syndicated to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad. After Siskel's death in 1999, he auditioned several potential replacements, ultimately choosing Richard Roeper to fill the open chair. He was known for his weekly review column (appearing in the Chicago Sun-Times since 1967, and later online) and for the television program Siskel & Ebert at the Movies, which he co-hosted for 23 years with Gene Siskel. Roger Joseph Ebert was a Pulitzer Prize-winning American film critic and screenwriter. Ebert's movie reviews were syndicated to more than 200 newspapers in the United States and abroad. The program was retitled Ebert & Roeper and the Movies in 2000. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |